There are 4 windows in DP that I keep open at all times: the Tracks Overview, Sequence Editor, MIDI Graphic Editor, and the Mixing Board. To accomplish the same tasks in Logic sometimes requires opening more windows which may not line up the information between them. I've been working in MIDI and audio for a long, long time, so maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I do NOT like working with tracks in Logic.ĭP is more likely to have a lot of information editable in a single window, such that multiple tracks, notes, and controllers can be compared and aligned. There may be ways around it in Logic if you want separate tracks, but I don't know what they are. That's four kinds of tracks, and I prefer to group them in certain ways and route them in certain ways, and it just works better if those stay separate. I can route their output to audio tracks or Aux tracks, and I can route several MIDI tracks to any instrument. In DP, I can put my instruments in a "V-Rack," which is like having a rack of gear that behaves the way MIDI racks always behaved. That makes it simple for the first time user to play something and hear a sound, but it complicates advanced templates, at least for me. In Logic, a single track can be Instrument, MIDI, and Audio all in one. Logic blurs the distinction between tracks. What is there (Logic's beat adjustment) is barely satisfactory, but I'd hate to use it every day. I searched for a year for the method I was looking for in Logic, finally realizing that it's just not there. If you record free performances and then adjust the bar lines and beats to line up with the performance, DP is more precise and easier to work with. I've heard people argue the opposite, so there may be ways of working in which Logic is better suited, but for musicians who are trying to get phrases to sound musical and ensembles to gel, DP's tools are indispensable. The MIDI editing tools in DP are superior, IMO. You can live a long and happy life with DP, without ever opening a Environment Window. That matters a lot if you're working with it all day. Despite big improvements with Logic X, the user interface is still nowhere as good and as flexible as DPs. There are no DAWs that do a really good job of conforming a tempo map to freely recorded music, but DP gives a more predictable result if the music is reasonably well played. You're pretty much dependent on experienced users on forums. I doubt anyone at Apple has ever helped a Logic user with a problem. MOTU supports DP better than Apple supports Logic. DP has an elegant means of handling multiple sequences. That could change with the next Logic X.x update, but for now, whenever I use Logic, there will be something that doesn't work as expected, and you just don't know if it's a user error or a bug. Logic is easier to deal with if you're doing a lot of bounces. Logic makes it easier to set up VIs although that comes with some limitations. I think the sounds are excellent given the price. Logic's included sounds and players, especially EXS24 can be very quick and convenient if you want simple tunes that sound slick. Logic is cheap and everywhere, everyone can do something with it, and third party stuff will work with it more often (with the exceptions noted below). I use DP if I have a simple choice, but from watching how others work, I think the preference depends a lot on what sort of work you're doing, and which one can most easily and quickly do what you want.Ī few things I experience on a regular basis: I use both regularly mainly because people I work with use Logic, so it's hard to avoid.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |